On the tarmac of a private airport somewhere between Europe and the Persian Gulf, a man steps out of a gleaming jet with gold-tinted windows. The crew lines up, heads bowed, as a second jet in the same livery waits behind, engines slowly humming. Far beyond the fences of the runway, 17,000 homes carry his name on the land deeds. In garages scattered across continents, 300 cars rest under silky covers. On coastlines he rarely visits, 52 yachts are tied up, each one alone worth a lifetime of salaries.
He is not a tech founder or a Wall Street legend.
He is a king.
The king whose fortune looks unreal even in 2026
The richest monarch in the world lives in a reality that barely resembles ours. Estimates put his personal and family-controlled wealth north of $40 billion, some say far more if you count the opaque networks of land holdings and state-linked companies. Officially, he is a constitutional monarch. Unofficially, he owns a slice of almost everything you see: banks, telecoms, airports, luxury hotels.
When he travels, it can look less like a royal tour and more like a moving city of steel and kerosene.
The headline numbers seem almost impossible to believe. Roughly 17000 homes connected to his massive real estate holdings. No fewer than 38 private jets with many being long-range models that national airlines typically use. A personal vehicle collection containing approximately 300 cars that includes custom Rolls-Royces & armored off-road vehicles.
And then there are the **52 luxury yachts**. Some are classic wooden boats, others are megayachts with helipads, spas, cinemas and full-time crews who live onboard for months. One former crew member described in a documentary how a single week’s fuel bill matched a small city’s annual public transport budget.
Behind these numbers sits a simple, blunt structure: the monarchy owns the land and the land prints the money. Oil and gas revenues, sovereign wealth funds, state-backed conglomerates – all flow back towards the royal center.
In many Gulf and Southeast Asian kingdoms, the line between “public wealth” and “personal wealth” is blurry. Palaces double as state offices. Government jets moonlight as family shuttles. Official residences quietly turn into private assets. *What looks like one man’s fortune is often a tightly woven web of dynastic control, law, and tradition.*
That’s why counting his real net worth is almost impossible.
➡️ Bad news for drivers who love shortcuts across fields, the supreme court has just ruled that decades of cutting corners doesn’t give them any right to do it
➡️ What does pushing your chair back in after a meal really say about you, according to psychology?
➡️ China sets a new world record in energy with a titanic feat at its Tianwan solar plant and 19.45-kilometre 220 kV line
➡️ “I thought I needed more discipline,” but this trick made things easier
➡️ This country could face a historic winter due to a rare mix of La Niña and the polar vortex
# Many People Do Not Realize It But Sweet Potatoes and Regular Potatoes Are Barely Related and Science Explains the Surprising Reason Why
Most people assume that sweet potatoes and regular potatoes are close relatives in the plant world. After all they share similar names and both grow underground as starchy tubers that we eat. However this common assumption could not be further from the truth. These two vegetables are actually distant cousins at best and belong to completely different plant families. Regular potatoes belong to the Solanaceae family which is commonly known as the nightshade family. This family includes other familiar plants like tomatoes, eggplants, peppers and even tobacco. Sweet potatoes on the other hand are members of the Convolvulaceae family which is the morning glory family. This means that sweet potatoes are more closely related to decorative flowering vines than they are to the potatoes you might put in your stew. The confusion between these two vegetables stems mainly from their similar appearance and culinary uses. Both grow beneath the soil surface and both serve as excellent sources of carbohydrates in human diets around the world. Both can be baked, mashed fried or roasted. This functional similarity has led to their names being linked in the minds of consumers and cooks alike. From a botanical perspective the differences become quite clear. Regular potatoes are modified stems called tubers that grow on underground stolons. These tubers develop from the stem tissue & contain nodes or eyes from which new plants can sprout. Sweet potatoes are actually storage roots that swell with nutrients. They develop directly from the root system rather than from modified stem tissue. The plants themselves look nothing alike when growing. Potato plants have compound leaves and produce small flowers that can be white, pink or purple. They can even produce small green fruits that resemble tiny tomatoes though these are toxic and should never be eaten. Sweet potato plants have heart-shaped leaves & produce attractive trumpet-shaped flowers that clearly show their relationship to morning glories. The evolutionary paths of these two plants diverged millions of years ago. Regular potatoes originated in the Andean region of South America where indigenous peoples domesticated them thousands of years ago. Sweet potatoes also come from the Americas but their exact origin is debated among scientists with Central America and northern South America being the most likely candidates. What makes this even more interesting is that humans independently decided that both of these unrelated plants were valuable food sources. This represents a case of convergent evolution in human agriculture where different cultures recognized the value of underground storage organs as reliable food sources. Both plants store energy in their underground parts to survive difficult seasons and humans learned to harvest this stored energy for themselves. The nutritional profiles of these two vegetables also differ significantly despite their similar uses. Sweet potatoes contain much higher levels of vitamin A in the form of beta-carotene which gives orange varieties their distinctive color. They also have more fiber and natural sugars. Regular potatoes contain more potassium and vitamin C along with different types of starches that behave differently during cooking. Understanding that these vegetables are not closely related helps explain why they respond differently to growing conditions and cooking methods. Sweet potatoes prefer warmer climates and longer growing seasons while regular potatoes can tolerate cooler temperatures. Sweet potatoes become sweeter when cooked slowly because their starches convert to sugars while regular potatoes become fluffier due to their different starch composition. This botanical distinction matters for more than just trivia. People with nightshade sensitivities who must avoid regular potatoes can often eat sweet potatoes without problems. Gardeners need to use completely different growing techniques for each plant. Food scientists and chefs must understand these differences to use each vegetable appropriately in recipes. The naming confusion persists in many languages and cultures around the world. In some places sweet potatoes are called yams even though true yams are yet another completely unrelated plant from Africa and Asia. This layering of confusion shows how common names can obscure botanical reality. Science has revealed through genetic analysis just how distant the relationship between these two plants really is. They split from their last common ancestor so long ago that calling them relatives is almost meaningless in practical terms. They share no more recent common ancestry than humans share with fish. Despite being botanical strangers these two plants have both become staples in human diets across the globe. They have fed civilizations prevented famines and continue to provide essential nutrition to billions of people. Their similar roles in human society came about not because of their relationship to each other but because of their individual relationships with humans who recognized their value. The next time you see sweet potatoes & regular potatoes sitting side by side in the grocery store remember that their proximity on the shelf does not reflect their position on the tree of life. They are examples of how evolution can produce similar solutions in completely different lineages and how humans have shaped their own food supply by domesticating diverse plants that happened to meet their needs.
➡️ Goodbye kitchen islands: the 2026 trend replacing them is more practical, more elegant, and already transforming modern homes
➡️ After an epic 1,000 km journey, France delivers a 500‑tonne giant vital to Hinkley Point C’s nuclear reactor
How do you even live with 38 jets and 52 yachts?
There is a whole industry dedicated to keeping royal excess running. Aviation consultants, yacht brokers, discreet Swiss bankers, London estate managers – they orbit around this kind of king like moons around a planet. Each jet needs pilots, technicians, parts, hangars. Each yacht eats up crew salaries, dry docks, refits. Each home has gardeners, security, cleaners, drivers.
The logistics alone could fill a small ministry.
People who’ve worked around these circles often tell similar stories. A last‑minute decision to move a weekend from the Mediterranean to the Maldives triggers a silent scramble: one jet for the king, one for entourage, one for luggage and security gear. Yachts reposition quietly days in advance, burning thousands of liters of fuel before a single royal foot touches the deck.
One former steward described a typical day at sea: breakfast table set for ten, with imported fruit and pastries from three countries. Two guests show up. Everything else goes straight into the bin. Let’s be honest: nobody really does this every single day. Yet when the king is on board, the rule is simple – abundance first, efficiency far behind.
Why so many homes? Partly security, partly protocol, partly status. In certain regions, having a palace in every major city is less about comfort and more about power projection. A residence becomes a message: “I am present here, always.”
Cars tell another story: taste, hobbies, sometimes a quiet obsession with engineering. One royal garage might hold a vintage British Land Rover next to an ultra-rare hypercar limited to ten units worldwide. Yachts, on the other hand, are moving privacy. Far from cameras and city noise, a king can host negotiations, family gatherings, or simply drift in silence.
The boats, the jets, the palaces – they’re not just toys,” a former royal adviser once told a local magazine. “They are architecture for influence.”
- Jets: project speed and reach, from state visits to surprise business meetings.
- Homes: anchor prestige in multiple cities and countries at once.
- Cars: stage local appearances that feel glamorous yet controlled.
- Yachts: offer floating sanctuaries where decisions can be made off-grid.
What this kind of wealth does to the rest of us
Most of us will never set foot in a royal jet, yet we still live in the shadow of this kind of fortune. Social media pulls those private worlds right into our palms. A blurred photo of a golden bathroom tap. A leaked interior shot of a jet with a king-sized bed and marble sinks. A satellite view of a palace so large it has its own golf course and zoo.
Scroll long enough and you start to feel either numb or quietly furious.
Royal wealth exists in an odd contradiction. Palaces & crowns are defended through ceremony and national pride. Meanwhile nurses and teachers in those same nations work multiple jobs just to cover rent. When oil revenues climb the royal estates expand. When prices drop the public services face cuts but the private aircraft continue their flights. The gap between royal luxury and everyday struggle grows wider each year. Young graduates leave university only to find that decent housing costs more than their entire salary. They watch news footage of state banquets & gold-trimmed halls while they split apartments with strangers. The disconnect feels more obvious with each passing season. Defenders of monarchy point to tradition and stability. Critics see an outdated system that drains resources from schools & hospitals. Both sides make their arguments but the financial reality remains unchanged. Royal households maintain their funding regardless of economic conditions affecting ordinary citizens. This imbalance raises questions about fairness in modern society. Some countries have reduced royal budgets in response to public pressure. Others maintain the status quo and avoid the conversation entirely. The debate continues without resolution while the contrast between palace wealth and public hardship becomes harder to ignore.
We’ve all been there, that moment when you compare your crowded morning commute with a news image of a monarch stepping directly from limousine to aircraft stairs. It hits hard because it’s not just about money; it’s about who gets to move through the world without friction.
Some defenders argue that ultra-rich kings fuel entire economies: jobs in hospitality, construction, aviation, luxury retail. They talk about philanthropy, scholarships, big donations after earthquakes or floods. Critics answer with a plain-truth sentence: royal charity doesn’t erase royal extraction.
The real question isn’t whether one king “deserves” 17,000 homes. It’s what happens to a society when so much power and property concentrates in one bloodline for generations. Does that freeze mobility for everyone else? Or can it coexist with thriving middle classes and real political voice?
Those are the conversations quietly starting in living rooms, cafés and encrypted group chats from Kuala Lumpur to Kuwait City.
| Key point | Detail | Value for the reader |
|---|---|---|
| Scale of royal wealth | 17,000 homes, 38 jets, 300 cars, 52 yachts tied to one monarchy | Gives context to headlines and viral photos you see online |
| How the system works | Mix of land ownership, state companies and blurred public/private assets | Helps you understand why counting this fortune is so difficult |
| Impact on ordinary lives | Symbolic gap between royal excess and everyday struggles | Invites you to question fairness, power and what “wealth” should mean |
FAQ:
- Who is considered the richest king in the world?
Depending on the year and the methodology, rankings often place Gulf or Southeast Asian monarchs at the top, with fortunes linked to oil wealth, land ownership and state-controlled companies. Exact names vary because so much of this money is hidden behind opaque structures.- Are those 17,000 homes all personal mansions?
Not exactly. The figure usually includes a mix of palaces, royal residences, official compounds and vast real-estate portfolios managed by royal-linked entities. Many are technically “state” properties that the royal family can use as if they were private.- Why does a king need 38 private jets?
He doesn’t, in the everyday sense. The fleet covers different roles: long-haul state visits, regional hops, backup aircraft, planes dedicated to security or cargo, and jets reserved for other royal family members. Part of it is logistics, part of it is prestige.- Who pays for the yachts, jets and car collections?
Funding usually comes from a blend of personal fortune, returns from sovereign wealth funds, state-owned businesses and annual budgets allocated by parliaments or royal courts. The exact split is rarely transparent, which is where most criticism begins.- Will this kind of royal wealth disappear one day?
It depends on three forces: the price of natural resources, pressure from younger generations demanding transparency, and any political reforms that clearly separate public money from personal assets. Some monarchies are slowly adapting. Others are doubling down on their old models, at least for now.
